Working
Title: College Athletic Programs Do More Harm than Good (terrible title will
fix)
Topic
A decrease in public funding has
forced many universities to privatize. As a result, such universities actively
seek out new ways to generate revenue. One of the most popular methods has been
the development of college athletics. According to many proponents of college
sports, athletics can lead to stronger support from state legislature,
increased alumni donations, and revenue from admissions (Dowling 37). While
this is true for the most part, college athletics also has many negative
effects on a university. For example, the profit generated from athletics may
be eclipsed by the cost of supporting an athletic team. Furthermore, strong
support of sports teams may lead to a decrease in academics as universities
begin to make exceptions for promising athletes whom may not be up to academic
standards. Lastly, college athletics may lead to legal scandals ranging from
forging transcripts to covering up rape accusations. With these issues in mind,
one must ask themselves whether or not benefits of college sports are
outweighed by the costs.
Research
Question
My research question will be: Does
college athletics actually generate any real revenue, and are the legal issues
and decrease in academic prestige worth it? It seems possible to answer, and I
will attempt to research each point individually. Overall, the topic is very
controversial. Crime specifically is very controversial, as not everyone agrees
that college athletes are able to get away with crimes any more than their peers.
Theoretical
Frame and Case
To support the idea that the revenue
generated by athletics may not be significant, I will use Cheslock and Knight’s
article, which outlines a pattern where intercollegiate athletics programs
become trapped and forced into constantly increasing their spending, thereby
promoting financial strain and imbalance. To begin, Cheslock and Knight
consider how some top athletics programs are able to generate revenue through a
number of external sources, such as admissions or television. However, they soon realize that the
expenditures of those leading programs increase as revenue from external
sources increases, thereby forcing lesser programs to increase their own
expenditures in order to keep up. Lastly, when such lesser programs can’t keep
up, they resort to institutional subsidies or student fees. The result is an
imbalanced program where the revenue is very unreliable.
In order to support the idea of
academic decline resulting from athletic programs, I will use the ideas mentioned
by Dowling. In order to build their athletic programs, many universities will
go through great lengths to admit students who are athletically talented, yet
academically lacking. While this may be good for the sports teams, lowering the
bar for these students will lead to an overall drop in the academic quality of
the university. Smart students do not want to go to a university where their
peers are in need of remediation, and talented professors do not want to be
teaching remedial classes. As a result, such students and professors will go
out of their way to avoid attending these universities, resulting in academic
decline.
There are many academic scandals
resulting from college athletics programs. I will use the article from the
Chronicle of Higher Education to describe the volume of such scandals. Dowling
also describes one scandal involving the forgery of academic transcripts at the
University of New Mexico (22). My overall point will be that athletics leads to
crime, which takes its own toll on a university as people typically do not want
to attend a college which supports fraud.
Colleges may also cover up crimes
committed by athletes in order to save their own sports programs. One article
in the Sociology of Sport Journal describes how athletes are significantly less
likely to be convicted of sexual assault. Another article by Lavigne in ESPN
describes athletes such as Chris Rainey who committed numerous crimes, but were
able to get away with no charges or very limited charges. I will try to prove
whether or not these statements are entirely true and if they are a direct
result of athletic programs turning a blind eye.
Case
As mentioned above, Cheslock and
Knight describe a pattern of economic imbalance present in a number of athletic
programs at universities. Such universities seem to directly prove my belief
that college athletics do not actually produce significant revenue. Dowling
also provides a description of New Mexico State, which struggled with both
academic decline and athletics related legal scandals.
Finally, while I was not able to find many scholarly
articles on the topic, the article ny Lavigne describes cases like Chris Rainey’s
where athletes were able to escape crime charges. I was also able to find an
article in the Sociology of Sports Journal which claims that athletes are less
likely to be convicted of sexual assault. I will attempt to find more article supporting
this idea.
Works Cited
Benedict, Jeffrey, and Alan Klein. "Arrest And
Conviction Rates For Athletes Accused Of Sexual Assault." Sociology Of
Sport Journal 14.1 (1997): 86-94. Academic
Search Premier. Web. 19 Oct. 2015.
Cheslock, John J., and David B. Knight.
"Diverging Revenues, Cascading Expenditures, And Ensuing Subsidies: The
Unbalanced And Growing Financial Strain Of Intercollegiate Athletics On
Universities And Their Students." Journal
Of Higher Education 86.3 (2015): 417-447. Academic Search Premier. Web. 13
Oct. 2015.
Dowling, William C. Confessions of a Spoilsport: My Life and Hard times Fighting Sports
Corruption at an Old Eastern University. University Park: Pennsylvania
State UP, 2007. Print.
Lavigne, Paula. "Lawyers, Status, Public
Backlash Aid College Athletes Accused of Crimes." ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, 15 June 2015. Web. 20 Oct. 2015.
WOLVERTON, BRAD. "NCAA Says It's Investigating
Academic Fraud At 20 Colleges." Chronicle Of Higher Education 61.20
(2015): A13. Academic Search Premier.
Web. 19 Oct. 2015.